Prediction of Paul Goldstein vs Fred Hemmes Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
P. Goldstein vs F. Hemmes

Paul Goldstein
USA
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
l
1
Win
2
Played
1
Win
49
Age
44
5'10" (178 cm)
Height
6'0" (183 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
58
Best Rank
188
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$270.2K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Fred Hemmes
NED
l
l
w
l
w
l
l
w
l
l
1
Win
2
Played
1
Win
49
Age
44
5'10" (178 cm)
Height
6'0" (183 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
58
Best Rank
188
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$270.2K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Goldstein 1 - 1 Hemmes
They have played 6 sets in total, with Paul Goldstein winning 3 and Fred Hemmes winning 3. The last match between Paul Goldstein and Fred Hemmes was at the The Wright Financial Group, Inc. Challenger - Champaign, 21-11-2003, Round: SF, Surface: I.hard, with Paul Goldstein getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Goldstein | 1 |
| Hemmes | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(SF) The Wright Financial Group, Inc. Challenger - Champaign(11-21-03)
Paul Goldstein
4
6
6
Fred Hemmes
6
3
2
(Q2) Copenhagen Open - Copenhagen(02-24-03)
Fred Hemmes
6
3
6
Paul Goldstein
2
6
3
P. Goldstein vs F. Hemmes H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $270,180 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 56.64% (307-235) | Career Total W/L | 56.11% (170-133) |
| 1 | Indoor | 1 |
| 12 | Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
P. Goldstein vs F. Hemmes Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paul Goldstein has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Fred Hemmes has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paul Goldstein, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Fred Hemmes has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paul Goldstein has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fred Hemmes has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paul Goldstein has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Fred Hemmes winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paul Goldstein has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 221/148), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 47% (W/L 15/17). Fred Hemmes has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 97/57), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 14% (W/L 1/6).
- Player level: In the last year, Paul Goldstein has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Fred Hemmes has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Paul Goldstein winning 1 times and Fred Hemmes being victorious 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Paul Goldstein winning 3 and Fred Hemmes winning 3.
- The last match between Paul Goldstein and Fred Hemmes was at the The Wright Financial Group, Inc. Challenger - Champaign, 21-11-2003, Round: SF, Surface: I.hard, with Paul Goldstein getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paul Goldstein and Fred Hemmes have played a deciding set 2 times, with Paul Goldstein winning 1 times and Fred Hemmes 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paul Goldstein has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Fred Hemmes has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paul Goldstein has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fred Hemmes has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paul Goldstein has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fred Hemmes has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Paul Goldstein vs Fred Hemmes Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
P. Goldstein vs F. Hemmes H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 27 | Games Won | 26 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Goldstein 0%, Hemmes 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Goldstein 0%, Hemmes 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Goldstein 0%, Hemmes 0%.
P. Goldstein Recent Matches Played
F. Hemmes Recent Matches Played

P. Goldstein vs F. Hemmes Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.64% (307/235) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.11% (170/133) |
| 54.95% (722/592) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.81% (370/305) |
| 52.41% (6459/5864) | Games Win/Loss | 51.97% (3250/3004) |
| 59.89% (221/148) | Hard Win/Loss | 62.99% (97/57) |
| 48.44% (31/33) | Clay Win/Loss | 48.96% (47/49) |
| 51.95% (40/37) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54.35% (25/21) |
| 46.88% (15/17) | Grass Win/Loss | 14.29% (1/6) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 138 | Aces Total | 9 |
| 0.03 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 |
| 186 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 477.19 | Average Opponent Rank | 449.49 |
| 60% (2947/4898) | 1st Serve % | 66% (135/205) |
| 65% (1900/2941) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (92/135) |
| 47% (920/1940) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (25/70) |
| 42% (198/466) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (10/24) |
| 39% (1855/4704) | Return Points Win % | 42% (86/203) |
| 44.07% (26/33) | Slam W/L | 50.00% (3/3) |
| 41.94% (13/18) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49.19% (91/94) | Main Tour W/L | 37.50% (15/25) |
| 66.29% (177/90) | Challenger W/L | 55.56% (85/68) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 64.42% (67/37) |
| 58% (287/499) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (163/287) |
| 48% (19/40) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 48% (70/147) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (39/69) |
| 49% (87/176) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (47/84) |
| 85% (295/250) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (168/146) |
| 15% (295/44) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (168/22) |
| 22% (247/55) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (132/21) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
11:00 AM 05/11/25
PredictionW1
1.6
W2
2.33
01:00 PM 05/11/25
PredictionW1
6.35
W2
1.114
02:00 PM 06/11/25
PredictionW1
2.68
W2
1.4
05:00 AM 06/11/25
PredictionW1
2.11
W2
1.63
09:10 PM 05/11/25
PredictionW1
2.81
W2
1.43
06:00 PM 05/11/25
PredictionW1
2.03
W2
1.68
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
04 Nov 2025
Solana Sierra vs Miriam Bianca Bulgaru Prediction – WTA Tucuman Open – 5th November 2025 Best Bets
04 Nov 2025
Malaika Rapolu vs Alycia Parks Prediction – WTA Austin 125 – 4th November 2025 Best Bets
04 Nov 2025
Mariano Navone vs Murkel Dellien Prediction – ATP Lima 3 Challenger – 4th November 2025 Best Bets
04 Nov 2025
Iva Jovic vs Anna-Lena Friedsam Prediction – WTA Austin 125 – 4th November 2025 Best Bets
04 Nov 2025
Martina Capurro Taborda vs Simona Waltert Prediction – WTA Tucuman Open – 4th November 2025 Best Bets
04 Nov 2025
Eliot Spizzirri vs Nuno Borges Prediction – ATP Hellenic Championship – 4th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
18:30
H2H 5-6
17:00
H2H 3-3
17:00
H2H 3-1
18:30
H2H 1-1
11:00
H2H 2-1
Tennis Events This Week
Hellenic Championship - Athens
Greece
Moselle Open - Metz
France
Helsinki Challenger
Finland
Knoxville Challenger
United States
Lima 3 Challenger
Peru
Matsuyama Challenger
Japan
Taipei Challenger
Chinese Taipei
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Manama
Bahrain
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M15 Valledupar
Colombia
M25 Guadalajara
Mexico
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Valencia
Spain